Article 13

#SaveYourInternet

Article 13 is a new EU legislation which aims to improve the protection of copyright material online. While this sounds like a good idea, as it helps to protect the work of content producers (e.g. musicians, photographers, YouTubers etc.) Article 13, as written by the European Parliament, will have serious unintended consequences for everyone. Let's come together for a better solution.

1. What is Article 13?

   • Article 13 is one part of a proposed European Union (EU) copyright legislation created with the intent to better protect creativity and find effective ways for copyright holders to protect their content online. (Official text here).
   • To be clear, we support the goals of Article 13 and its push to help creators and artists succeed; we want more effective ways for copyright holders to protect their content. But Article 13, as written by the European Parliament, will have serious unintended consequences for everyone, so we're asking to find a better way forward.

2. What's the status of Article 13?

   • On 12 September, the European Parliament voted to move forward with Article 13.
   • However, Article 13 is not yet a law. The language is being drafted and revised in EU trilogue negotiations between representatives from the European Commission, Parliament and Council.
   • This language could be finalised by the end of the year, and EU member states may have up to two years to incorporate the directive into national law.

3. What changes with Article 13?

   • The proposed version of Article 13 would eliminate the existing notice-and-takedown system currently in place to protect rights-holders and platforms. This would make platforms such as YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, Soundcloud, Dailymotion, Reddit and Snapchat liable – at the moment of upload – for any copyright infringement in uploads from users, creators and artists.
   • This in turn would mean that platforms including YouTube would be forced to block the vast majority of uploads from Europe and views in Europe for content uploaded elsewhere given the uncertainty and complexity of copyright ownership (more on this below).

4. What would be the impact if the European Parliament version of Article 13 passes?

   • The risks associated with accepting content uploads with partial or disputed copyright information would be far too large for platforms such as YouTube.
   • As a result, YouTube would be forced to block millions of videos (existing and new ones) in the European Union. It could drastically limit the content that one can upload to the platform in Europe.
   • Creators would be hit especially hard. Videos that could be blocked include: educational videos (from channels such as Kurzgesagt in Germany and C.G.P. Grey in the UK), a large number of official music videos (like Despacito from Luis Fonsi or Mafioso from Lartiste), fan music covers, mashups, parodies and more.
   • As such, Article 13 threatens hundreds of thousands of jobs, European creators, businesses, artists and everyone they employ.

5. What does this mean for me as a YouTube creator or artist in the European Union?

   • YouTube and other platforms may have no choice but to block your existing videos and prevent you from uploading new ones in the European Union unless you can prove that you own everything in your videos (including visuals and sounds).

6. What does this mean for me as a YouTube creator or an artist NOT in the European Union?

   • YouTube and other platforms are likely to block your videos (including existing ones) to users in the European Union if there is partial or disputed copyright information.

7. What types of copyrighted content would I not be able to use in my videos?

   • Examples of copyrighted material that might be affected in your videos include images, artwork, software, excerpts from books, music, parodies and much more. (Read more here).

8. Why aren't copyright matching tools like Content ID enough?

   • With Article 13 as currently written, copyright matching tools like Content ID wouldn't help platforms such as YouTube to keep content on the platform.
   • Content ID works if rights-holders use it and provide clarity as to what belongs to them. However, in many cases information on copyright ownership is missing, or there is partial knowledge, meaning that no system could accurately identify full copyright information at the point of upload.
   • Put simply, a piece of content with partial or unknown ownership is – to YouTube – treated the same as a piece of content that is unlicensed and so would have to be blocked.

9. Is there a better way forward with Article 13?

   • Yes! We're asking lawmakers to find the better balance we all need to protect against copyright violations and still enable European users, creators and artists to share their voices online. In order to do that, we need a system where both platforms and rights-holders collaborate.
   • What this means in reality is three things:
     • Rights-holders should work with platforms to identify the content they own, so that the platforms know what is protected under copyright and can give rights-holders control to block content if they choose.
     • Platforms should only be held liable for content identified to them using tools like Content ID or through notice and takedown.
     • Platforms and rights-holders should negotiate in good faith where licences and rights can be easily identified

10. What can I do to help find a better way forward with Article 13?

    • European representatives are still working on the final version of Article 13 and there is time to work together towards a better path forward.
    • The European policymakers involved in negotiating Article 13 need to hear and see that real people could be negatively impacted if Article 13 goes into effect as written by the Parliament! That's why we need you and your fans to make your voice heard now by:
      • Making a video about Article 13
      • Tweeting about Article 13 with the hashtag #SaveYourInternet
      • Joining the movement at youtube.com/saveyourinternet